
When we’re in distress, our first need often isn’t to fix the feeling, it’s to get it out. To hand it over to someone else who can hold it. This isn’t immaturity. It’s a deeply human process rooted in our earliest experiences.
As infants, our nervous systems couldn’t self-regulate. We relied on another mind and body to hold the tidal waves of sensation and emotion that flooded us. Our caregivers, when attuned, served as containers. They absorbed our raw feelings, softened them, and handed them back in a digestible form. That’s how we learned that our feelings were survivable. That’s how we developed the ability to hold them ourselves.
When that process goes wrong, when no one takes in what feels unbearable, we grow up with a deep hunger to evacuate feelings that still feel “too big” to manage alone. And every time someone jumps in with advice or reassurance instead of attunement, it blocks that evacuation. It tells us, on a visceral level: Your need to offload is too much. You need to manage this yourself.
When someone says, “Don’t cry,” “Think positive,” or “Here’s what you should do,” it sounds helpful. But what it does is shift the focus from being with us to the other’s need for us to not feel what we’re feeling.
That shift moves us away from what psychoanalysts call containmente and into something else entirely, a demand for self-regulation that can feel like a pressure to do something we’re already too overloaded to do.
The need to be “held in mind” by another is the foundation of psychological health. Long before language, we learned safety through resonance, through another’s ability to sense and share our inner state without being overwhelmed by it. That experience creates the conviction that:
“My feelings can exist in another person without destroying them. Therefore, I am not too much.”
But let’s be honest: sitting with someone else’s raw pain without fixing it is excruciating. Their emotions stir our own. We may feel the pull to rescue or retreat, to give advice or to shut it down—because their dysregulation activates our own.
But real empathy isn’t about merging or reacting. It’s about what Winnicott called “holding.” It’s about staying connected, without collapsing into the other’s chaos or demanding they change. It’s a delicate balance: being empathic enough to feel with someone else, while still separate enough to have an experience different from their’s.
At the deepest level, we don’t want quick fixes. We don’t want advice that bypasses our pain. We want to know that our feelings can exist in another mind and still be met with love and calm.
That is what makes us feel real.
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.